Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Facebook 'Em, Danno

David Weigel | 7.12.2006 1:44 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA)'s bill to regulate MySpace.com and other profile sites was beaten up in committee.

The bill, officially named the Deleting Online Predators Act, bars children from accessing social networking Web sites, such as MySpace, Friendster and Facebook, at schools and libraries that receive federal technology funding.

There's a wonderful irony in using hip wired language like "deleting" in a bill designed to block kids' access to some websites while they're at school; making the sites that much more attractive, of course, when the kids head home. Texas's Republican attorney general made fun of the bill, as did seven of the eight witnesses.

Ted Davis, director of the information technology department at Fairfax County Public Schools in Virginia, said the bill would "not protect students and it will place an added burden on schools."

Beth Yoke, an executive director with the American Library Association, said Fitzpatrick's bill was like trying to curb teenage car accidents by banning teens from the road. She said the bill would "block valuable technology" and "create barriers to information" that could be used for educational purposes.

Here's the punchline: the bill will probably pass anyway. The only committee members who complained about it were Democrats, and when it gets to the floor, who's going to essentially vote "yea" on TV ads portraying them as child molester-lovers?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Orange You Glad We're Having an Immigration Panic?

David Weigel is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (19)

Latest

The Glories of Mexican Dentistry

Brian Doherty | From the August/September 2025 issue

Georgia: The Possible Birthplace of Wine and Definite Birthplace of Stalin

Hunt Beaty | From the August/September 2025 issue

$500 Million To Paint the Border Wall? 5 of Trump's Strangest, Most Expensive Vanity Projects

Jeff Luse | 8.22.2025 5:28 PM

Cracker Barrel Didn't 'Go Woke.' It Just Went Broke.

Billy Binion | 8.22.2025 5:09 PM

What If TikTok Therapists Are Making People Less Happy?

Emma Camp | 8.22.2025 3:26 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300