Sure, Al. A Couple Hundred Tortured Detainees, 100,000+ Iraqi Citizens, the U.S. Constitution, and You.
Radley Balko | January 2, 2009, 10:29am
Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales actually made John Ashcroft look like the Bush administration's resident civil libertarian. By the time he left office, his zeal for executive power coupled with political ineptitude and general incompetence managed to win him contempt from both the left and the right.
Now Gonzales can't find a publisher for his book, and no one has yet offered him the cushy, high-paying job at a D.C. law firm that high-ranking public officials seem to think they're entitled to upon stepping down.
According to Gonzales, Gonzales is a victim. Check out this quote from his interview with the Wall Street Journal this week:
"What is it that I did that is so fundamentally wrong, that deserves this kind of response to my service?
. . . for some reason, I am portrayed as the one who is evil in formulating policies that people disagree with. I consider myself a casualty, one of the many casualties of the war on terror."
Ken Shultz | January 2, 2009, 11:09am | #
As a long time and vocal critic of Gonzlaes in these here environs, I'm sure no one will confuse me with a defender of Gonzales or the "War on Terror", but when he said he was a "casualty", I took it to mean he was a political casualty. ...that he was speaking metaphorically.
Also, I find it kind of funny* to see that he's more or less blaming this on his subordinates and/or others down the totem pole. I guess it's a bit of a running joke that anytime someone commits a war crime, they always seem to claim they were just following orders. Interesting twist to see Mr. Gonzales claim he was just giving orders...
I'd be interested to see Gonzales comment on the Schlesinger Report directly, which seemed to be quite clear about what his role was--it names him directly by title--in the formulation of the changes in interrogation policy.
While it's true that the policy changes he established and signed off on--according to the Schlesinger Report--were supposed to be used solely on illegal combatants in Guantanamo, and that people below him and out of the White House or Justice Department allowed them to be implemented on POWs in Iraq, that hardly excuses his role in establishing and implementing that policy...
Indeed, expecting those interrogation methods not to migrate is a bit like expecting the bank bailout not to creep over into the auto industry and anywhere else the wind blows. I mean, seriously, if he didn't see the likelihood of that happening, then he shouldn't have had a place at the policy making table. ...why he was elevated to Attorney General, again, after all this came out, shows how incompetent President Bush was. ...just in case any of you needed further evidence of that.
One last thing, even if what Gonzales is saying were true about the implementation side of the policy he crafted and signed off on, even if he were only guilty of what the Schlesinger Report said he did, that wouldn't excuse the moral depravity the interrogation policies he helped craft and signed off on were based on.
*I used "funny" sort of like Gonzales used "casualty". Please don't hate on me for speaking metaphorically. We should still hate Gonzales--just for the things he did, though, rather than for his metaphors.