The President of Metaphor
Matt Welch | September 16, 2008, 10:36am
John McCain is calling for a "9/11 Commission" to investigate the various bank failures on Wall Street.
"[American workers have] been betrayed by a casino on Wall Street of greedy, corrupt excess -- corruption and excess that has damaged them and their futures," he added. [...]
"We're going to need a '9/11 Commission' to find out what happened and what needs to be fixed," he said. "I warned two years ago that this situation was deteriorating and unacceptable. And the old-boy network and the corruption in Washington is directly involved, and one of the causes of this financial crisis that we're in today. And I know how to fix it, and I know how to get things done."
"Americans are hurting right now, and there's going to be a ripple effect of this financial crisis because of the greed and corruption and excess, and Wall Street treated the American economy like a casino," he continued. "And we can fix it, and we've got to keep people in their homes."
Recall that McCain has also advocated "Surge"-style tactics in high-crime U.S. cities, and said we're in a new "twilight struggle" against radical Islamists. What's next, a Shock and Awe energy policy? Vietnamization of the public school system?
Amakudari | September 16, 2008, 8:53pm | #
Um, ones that would have kept this shit from happening?
First of all, Frank never tried to seriously reform Fannie or Freddie, and he never indicated an aversion to the risks of low-income borrowers. Really, even during the worst scandals, almost every politician worked for no more than window-dressing (okay,
cough). Secondly, real estate values had
peaked by 2006 in most of the affected markets, and it was that initial wave of losses that caused banks to unwind leveraged positions at losses and fail to instill the confidence necessary to keep their funding costs down.
Uh huh. Deregulation of the financial industry didn't fail, because TRUE DEREGULATION has never been tried.
Quite frankly, the combination of regulation and deregulation
was horrible, though. As someone who works at a large bank, I can go into every single detail if you want.
I'd rather just point out that the US government rapidly expands credit, massively subsidizes housing, backs $5 trillion in MBS through now-nationalized GSEs, provides cheap mortgage financing through the FHLB network (think LIBOR-flat for illiquid mortgage collateral
versus the market's 200-600 bps premia for unsecured), and bails out i-banks too smart for their own good. Profitability from originating conforming mortgages hinges on volume, which relaxes lending standards in an easy money environment and creates an incentive for "innovation." Heck, even the mortgage interest deduction decreases the appeal of paying down principal.
For otherwise deregulated entities, those actions do encourage risky behavior, and I have ample reason to believe that in the absence of such huge market distortions the financial environment would be stronger. Likewise, keeping Glass-Steagall's bank separation provisions intact and mandating low-risk mortgage lending would have prevented the mortgage crisis, even if it only diverted our credit expansion to other bubbles.