Genarlow Wilson Update

My piece in the Chicago Tribune posted below ran on Sunday.

Since then, a new judge has ruled that because Wilson's sentence is greater than five years, he isn't permitted bond, and must remain in prison while Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker appeals the other judge's commutation of Wilson's sentence. A group of private donors had previously raised $1 million to free Wilson pending the appeal.

Wilson will now remain in prison at least until October, when the Georgia Supreme Court will consider the state's appeal. That court has already denied Wilson once.

Comments

Warren | June 28, 2007, 12:42pm | #

motherfuckers

stephen the goldberger | June 28, 2007, 12:44pm | #

that's some bullshit

David | June 28, 2007, 12:53pm | #

It doesn't make any sense to have the system set up this way. If Wilson were free and AG Baker's appeal won, Wilson would serve the remainder of his sentence and the state loses nothing. With Wilson in prison, if Baker's appeal loses, he lost another 4 months of his life that he can't get back, and the state loses the cost keeping him there.

If they don't believe that he's a flight risk or likely to commit a crime, keeping him in prison makes absolutely no sense.

Jim Bob | June 28, 2007, 1:01pm | #

I'm sure Thurbert Baker sleeps soundly at night, although his conscience may catch up to him on his deathbed.

Adam W. | June 28, 2007, 1:07pm | #

Well, fuck Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker.

scottp | June 28, 2007, 1:11pm | #

I don't believe in Hell, but I wish such a place did exist just for assholes like Thurbert Baker.

Seitz | June 28, 2007, 1:14pm | #

That court has already denied Wilson once.

But that was an appeal by Wilson, correct? They're hearing Baker's appeal this time. Hopefully they'll just keep on denyin'.

dhex | June 28, 2007, 1:30pm | #

so is this one of those "i can't admit i made a mistake" things or is it "i am a fucking fuckface who fucks felines for frappachinos" things?

The Wine Commonsewer | June 28, 2007, 1:36pm | #

The sentence would only be appropriate if it was MY daughter. Otherwise, it's ludicrous. Worse, it is difficult for me to comprehend why jailing this kid is so all fired important to Mr Baker (using the term Mr loosely).

Good piece.

P Brooks | June 28, 2007, 1:43pm | #

"... it is difficult for me to comprehend why jailing this kid is so all fired important to Mr Baker...."

Perhaps Baker dreams of one day being President.

Episiarch | June 28, 2007, 1:44pm | #

Wilson got a hummer from a teenage girl. Why isn't he getting an award? This prison business is really pushing it.

/R Kelly mode off

ChrisO | June 28, 2007, 1:54pm | #

Baker's "logic" is that freeing Wilson would lead to the freeing of a bunch of the pedophile scumbags the law at issue was actually intended to punish. Not saying I agree with him...

EF | June 28, 2007, 2:06pm | #

Johnson: The untold truth about Genarlow Wilson
By Eric Johnson | Columnist | Story updated at 7:36 PM on Saturday, June 23, 2007

The mainstream media is portraying Genarlow Wilson as a victim and Georgia as a backwater state by oversimplifying this case. There is more to this story than a young student getting 10 years in prison for consensual oral sex. A lot more.

Genarlow Wilson was charged with rape, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, aggravated sodomy and aggravated child molestation. He and five buddies videotaped their "party" on New Year's Eve with two young girls - one of whom was 17 and "semi-conscious" (according to the Georgia Court of Appeals) and another who was 15 and a minor.

This was not two star-crossed lovers on a date. Wilson engaged in intercourse with the 17-year-old after she was passed out drunk and high on drugs and encouraged the others to join him. She accused the young men of rape and has never recanted. Sex with a semi-conscious female who cannot grant consent is rape - even if she earlier granted it consensually. She also was locked in the bathroom in between the sex acts and this resulted in a "false imprisonment" conviction for one of the men. Later, all but one of them received oral sex from the minor. This is against the law in Georgia because a minor is not deemed capable of consenting to such an act.

There were six men with 40 prior arrests among them in a hotel room with a semi-conscious girl and a minor. They were consuming illegal drugs and alcohol underage. They weren't choirboys. One of the men impregnated a 12-year-old while awaiting trial and has since been convicted of statutory rape. Five of the six men pled guilty to the lesser charge of child molestation instead of aggravated child molestation. All are serving time.



Wilson refused the plea bargain and was unanimously convicted by a jury of his peers. The sentence for his crimes is a harsh, but mandatory, 10 years in prison. He continues to turn down offers that would release him from jail and keep him off the sexual offender registry. But he and his new lawyer appear to prefer martyrdom to freedom. There is a Web site, a publicist and a limo for his attorney.

People are judging this case based on 60-second news clips instead of watching the video, reading the court transcripts, and trusting the jury system. Georgia's laws are designed to protect minors from sexual predators. Genarlow and his buddies violated the law. A young girl charged them with rape. The police arrested them. A district attorney chose to prosecute them. A grand jury decided to indict them. And a jury convicted them.

Now, an entirely new judge enjoying his 15 minutes of fame ignored the law, the trial, the appeals, and the facts of the case. He reduced Wilson's sentence and ordered him released from prison. His decision was a shock and clear violation of Georgia law. The attorney general has filed an expedited appeal with Georgia's Supreme Court, which just last year unanimously upheld the constitutionality of an identical case. This has put the prisoner, his family, and the victims on an incredibly cruel and unnecessary emotional roller coaster.

Wilson is not the victim. A semi-conscious female and a minor girl were the victims. Society shouldn't wonder why females hesitate to charge "rape." They are portrayed as "trash," and the men are just doing what men do. Women should be outraged.

Life comes with accountability for our decisions. Genarlow Wilson could have selected different friends to hang with. He could have joined millions of law-abiding teens all over the country enjoying New Years' Eve without alcohol, drugs and sex. He could have left the hotel when the fun started. He didn't. He made a choice. Now his life has changed forever. That is sad. I hope other young men and girls will learn from this tragedy and avoid his errors.

• Johnson, R-Savannah, is president pro tempore of the Georgia Senate. He represents Bryan County and parts of Chatham and Liberty counties.

Published in the Athens Banner-Herald on 062407

Radley Balko | June 28, 2007, 2:11pm | #

Wilson was acquitted of the rape charge. The girl who performed oral sex on him has never denied she did so consensually. He was convicted only because she was 15.

I find it hard to believe Rep. Johnson is worried about the emotional well-being of Wilson and his family, given that he wants him to remain in prison for 10 years.

Balsim | June 28, 2007, 2:14pm | #

Aside from the stupidty of the original law, the real issues people should be looking at is the danager that mandatory min. sentences creat. If the original trial judge had the discretion to set a reasonble punishment after looking at all the facts we wouldn't be here today.

Roz | June 28, 2007, 2:14pm | #

EF,

The article you presented from Johnson, suggest exactly what this BLOG started with. The prosecutor is being an ASS. He's not following one ... He is an ASS. This case will be overturned in October. This boy should NOT accept a plea. He DID NOT RAPE that GIRL. Women should be OUTRAGED...over the fact that this is CALLED RAPE

Jake Boone | June 28, 2007, 2:15pm | #

If he was acquitted of rape, then this:

A young girl charged them with rape. The police arrested them. A district attorney chose to prosecute them. A grand jury decided to indict them. And a jury convicted them.

... is dishonest at best.

Balsim | June 28, 2007, 2:19pm | #

as i read it, there were two girls, one 17 yr that was the one the charged rape took place against, then there was the 15 yr old who gave the oral sex - still since he was acquited of the rape he shouldn't have that issues taken aginst him when sentence for the other "crime"

Andrew Myers | June 28, 2007, 2:24pm | #

"People are judging this case based on 60-second news clips instead of watching the video, reading the court transcripts, and trusting the jury system. Georgia's laws are designed to protect minors from sexual predators. Genarlow and his buddies violated the law. A young girl charged them with rape. The police arrested them. A district attorney chose to prosecute them. A grand jury decided to indict them. And a jury convicted them."

Uh, could this be any more dishonest? Yes, Genarlow was charged with rape - and acquitted. The DA decided he knew better and got him ten years on a technicality using a law designed to stop child molesters.

Genarlow may well have been guilty of rape, but a jury of his peers (who, it doesn't hurt to point out, have actually seen the tape in question) didn't think so, and it's not the DA's place to punish him for it anyway.

P Brooks | June 28, 2007, 2:55pm | #

"There were six men with 40 prior arrests among them...."

Is it just my imagination, or is this utterly irrelevant?

Randolph Carter | June 28, 2007, 2:59pm | #

Wowee Zowee! Justice Stevens writes that modern pot smokers are the same as those who frequented Speakeasies during the 20's and that it's not teh evil!

Randolph Carter | June 28, 2007, 3:02pm | #

also, if the jury saw the video of Genarlow and the girl, aren't they all guilty of viewing child pornography?

Ron | June 28, 2007, 3:29pm | #

EF: Mr. Johnson's argument underscores why liberty is under a very great threat in this country. Essentially, it comes down to this: "Well, the Constitution and that whole 'guilt beyond a reasonable doubt' standard are keeping us from putting criminals behind bars, so let's create a bunch of foot fault laws with draconian punishments that allow the prosecutors the freedom to go after the bad guys." There are countless "gotcha" laws on the books, for which many, many people could be convicted, but aren't because no prosecutor has identified them as a "bad guy". At least, not yet...

Roz | June 28, 2007, 4:40pm | #

It's best that the discretion GOES away. If JUSTICE is truly BLIND, then MAKE ALL CRIMES PUNISHABLE...not to the discretion of the DA. MAKE ALL CRIMES with MINIMUM SENTENCES.

Draconian law is a GOOD THING. Perhaps if PRISON was Modeled after Auswitz...and not a college DORM ... people woould stay in line.

Randolph Carter | June 28, 2007, 4:45pm | #

Roz, you look really hot in that leather trenchcoat. What a cool little swirly symbol on teh arm!

The Wine Commonsewer® | June 28, 2007, 7:47pm | #

Guess this case is a little more complex than a couple of teenagers fooling around. Maybe I came late to the party and missed something but it seems like I may have missed the gist of the entire story. That may well be my fault. Then again it may not be.

M | June 28, 2007, 9:46pm | #

Draconian law is a GOOD THING

Paradoxically, in a way it was, though at great human expense. Draco made all infractions capital offenses, prompting reasonable juries to acquit all defendants. IIRC.

bill | June 28, 2007, 11:16pm | #

If everyone who commits this crime is so evil, how come the Georgia legislature just changed the law to make it a lesser offense? After all, if he had had vaginal sex with her it would only have been a misdemeanor. Until recently in Georgia it was illegal for a husband and wife to have oral sex.

Elliott | July 5, 2007, 10:24am | #

This article by Johnson is pure crap. The outcry about this case is about the punishment, not the fact that these kids (all of them) engadged in less than admirable behavior. The punishment was clearly disporportionate (if I spelled that right) to the crime. Nobody is saying he is a choir boy, but he doesn't deserve ten years.

Judy Meltzer | July 5, 2007, 4:28pm | #

I dont blame the DA for having a vendetta against this particular kid. Most 17 year old boys would never have participated in this kind of activity.

This is a very long sentence for acting his age.

RC Brooks | July 5, 2007, 6:18pm | #

This is absurd. They amended the original law he was convicted under, but can't make his sentence retro active. He should be released immediately. I understand they want to be careful about precident, but this is nonsense. He should be ashamed of himself. Yes, the young man didn't behave in a manor that is PG, but certainly was acting as many teens do today. Is it appropriate? I don't think it is, but not anything he should have gotten prison time over. If it was my daughter, I would be upset she put herself in that sort of environment; but again, not worth a jail sentence.

The legal system in the US is out of control. No one has faith it in anymore. Too many overly harsh sentences for some and too lax for others. Money overcomes all to boot. How long can we continue?

D | July 5, 2007, 6:50pm | #

HMMMMM JURY OF HIS PEERS ....... A BUNCH OF SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS SAT ON JURY..... INTERESTING NEVER HEARD OF THAT MIX BEFORE. NOT TO MENTION HE HIMSELF IS ALSO A TEEN I ORIGINALLY THOUGHT THIS MUST BE SOME TWENTY SOMETHING MAN NOT SOME TEENAGER. WHOSE IDEA WAS IT TO SAY THAT 17 IS AN ADULT .... SO YOU CAN MAKE ADULT DECISIONS ABOUT SEX AT 17 BUT REALLY AREN'T OLD ENOUGH TO DRINK, SMOKE, BUY LIGHTERS OR DIE FOR YOUR COUNTRY BUT YOU CAN HANDLE RATIONAL DECISIONS ABOUT SEX HMMMM SOMETHING WRONG THERE.... AT 17 STILL NEED TO BE EMANCIPATED TO SURVIVE ON YOUE OWN LEGALLY BUT I COULD BE MISTAKEN ...AMAZING TODAYS WORLD

Littleme | July 5, 2007, 9:52pm | #

Okay, now this Wilson dude rape charge was dismissed. So, what does that mean?

It means that he is in jail for just having consensual sex with another teenager.

We are a society of barbaric people if we keep this guy in jail any longer.

Shame on anyone who thinks otherwise. Whatever the case was, how the story went, the bottom line was: He was convicted of having sex with another teenager.

He didn't rape anyone. He didn't kill anyone. Give the guy his freedom back. He has been punished too harshly.

brenda | July 6, 2007, 4:34pm | #

judy meltzer, what world do you live in?? "Most 17 year old boys would never have participated in this kind of activity."???
i'm 40 years old and 17 year old boys have been participating in this kind of activity long before i was 17!