Reason on Facebook
Reason on Twitter
Reason on YouTube
Reason RSS
The US bucket and spade brigade went on full alert [last Thursday] after research by a top physician revealed that people falling into holes dug in the sand had accounted for more fatalities in the US since 1990 than shark attacks - 16 as opposed to 12.Maron's article -- more of a letter, really -- is available to New England Journal subscribers here.
The article, written by Dr Bradley Maron in the New England Journal of Medicine, said sand holes and tunnels, the byproduct of building sand castles and other juvenile beach fortifications, could turn into deathtraps with horrifying speed.
Although such incidents were extremely rare, Dennis Arnold, who runs a beach patrol at Martha's Vineyard, off Cape Cod in Massachusetts, said lifeguards were under orders to stop children digging deep holes. Occasionally some parents protest, he said. "They'll say 'You're ruining my kid's day!' and I say 'I don't care!'," Mr Arnold was quoted as saying.
Castles Made of Sand IV: The Revenge -- This Time It's Personal
Move over, Jaws. A darker danger lurks on the beach:
Comments to "Castles Made of Sand IV: The Revenge -- This Time It's Personal":
Mark P Neyer | June 26, 2007, 11:58am | #
Thank god. This situation was really getting out of hand.Sandman | June 26, 2007, 11:59am | #
When the holes are policed, only the police will be...i ♥ Dan T. | June 26, 2007, 12:00pm | #
If one beach doesn't allow your kids to make sand castles, you're completely free to go to another beach that does.J sub D | June 26, 2007, 12:01pm | #
The victims ranged in age from 3 to 21 years (mean, 12 years), with 15 persons (29%) 10 years of age or younger; 45 (87%) were male.Why do sandcastle builders hate men?
Cracker's Boy | June 26, 2007, 12:04pm | #
Wouldn't it just be simpler to increase the number of shark attacks? That would reduce the newsworthiness of this story.CB
jimmydageek | June 26, 2007, 12:05pm | #
Why do sandcastle builders hate men?
I think it's likely due to the fact that men are too busy ogling the honeys instead of watching where they walk :)
You know, I could see how trolling Dan T. makes for hours of fun and is hoo-larious, but there is an outside chance he will see this as ridiculous as the rest of us. Uh, right?
Jesse Walker | June 26, 2007, 12:09pm | #
Wouldn't it just be simpler to increase the number of shark attacks?CB wins.
M | June 26, 2007, 12:11pm | #
What if they're wetland lobster sanctuaries?This will no longer be a problem when we get the right people to fall into holes.
Christopher Monnier | June 26, 2007, 12:14pm | #
Good thing the New England Journal of Medicine is covering this issue...nothing screams Medicine like people falling into holes...How is one fatality every 16 months for millions of beach-goers even considered a risk?
Digging holes is the only thing that keeps my kid from slinging chum out into the waves, attracting sharks.
Episiarch | June 26, 2007, 12:17pm | #
How is one fatality every 16 months for millions of beach-goers even considered a risk?You can't control people's behavior at the barrel of a gun* without some hyped up danger, dude. If it saves just one child...
* Dan T. running gag
jimmydageek | June 26, 2007, 12:18pm | #
Did they consider adding a people who are run over by beach patrol ATVs while buried under the sand category?Syd | June 26, 2007, 12:20pm | #
I'm impressed by the kids who are digging holes deep enough to bury a man.Notice that this comes down to less than one sand castle death a year--and shark attack deaths are less that one every two years.
Although one wonders about all those bodies buried under the sand that nobody knows about, which will be dug up as fossils by the cockroach civilization 100,000,000 years since.
Another in a long lists of examples of why the Onion just isn't that funny anymore; real life has gotten so rediculous you just can't parody it anymore. Seriously, if you cut and pasted that story word for word into the Onion, would anyone notice?
Jake Boone | June 26, 2007, 12:26pm | #
We were warned about this in 1981!Pro Libertate | June 26, 2007, 12:37pm | #
Hmmm. The MSM clearly has an anti-Florida bias. Always going on about the deadly sharks, beaches, hurricanes, sun, old age, giant mice, etc. Harumph.Pro Libertate | June 26, 2007, 12:37pm | #
Oh, and exploding spacecraft. Damned anti-Florida media!J sub D | June 26, 2007, 12:40pm | #
Damned anti-Florida media!Yeah. As long as the media just reported the facts about the sunshine state, then peoples perception of Florida and Floridian would be ... Never mind.
Ethan | June 26, 2007, 12:45pm | #
sand holes and tunnels, the byproduct of building sand castles and other juvenile beach fortifications, could turn into deathtraps with horrifying speed.Um, what? It's the speed at which these holes turn into "deathtraps" that is the horrifying bit? "Oh God! If only that deathtrap had become one more slowly! That would have provided me some small measure of solace as I lie here broken-necked!"
This one rounds out the absurdity: http://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/06/20/sand.deaths.ap/index.html
grylliade | June 26, 2007, 12:52pm | #
Reason's slow on the uptake this week. I saw this earlier on the Daily Illuminator. You were scooped by a game company. This would never have happened under Virginia Postrel! ;-)Derrick | June 26, 2007, 12:54pm | #
Even if the fatality rate from collapsing holes is low, what's wrong with trying to reduce it even further by convincing the beach owners to post and enforce rules about hole digging? Basically, these are deaths that didn't need to happen.The posts on this story disappoint me. There has to be a sensible libertarian solution under which rights are protected *and* people don't die needlessly.
they can have my hole (uh, sand castle hole) when they pry it out of my cold, dead, sandy fingers...
VikingMoose | June 26, 2007, 12:57pm | #
Wait a sec.Grylliade gave us (deliberately) one to drink. But what about Derrick. Is that two drinks? Or how do we do that one?
I'm disappointed in Derrick's post. It wasn't self righteous enough. Surely there's a libertarian position that is totally silly (in "the Colonel's" meaning) *and* completely beside the point...
[ducks. runs off]
jimmydageek | June 26, 2007, 12:59pm | #
Derrick,It's called, "freakish accidents will happen no matter what...get over it!"
If you're afraid of it, stay inside your home.
Taktix® | June 26, 2007, 1:00pm | #
The 17-year-old was playing football with friends when he jumped for a pass and fell backward into an eight-foot-deep hole someone had dug earlier.Sorry to be morose, but...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Pro Libertate | June 26, 2007, 1:02pm | #
Actually, Florida has been made intentionally dangerous in order to breed a special elite fighting force for the future.Aresen | June 26, 2007, 1:03pm | #
DerrickI suppose privately-owned beaches could make "no digging holes" one of the conditions of use.
However, the nannyism of this policy - designed to deal with an average of 1 fatality per year (or per how many million sand castles) is ridiculous.
There is no human activity that does not have an inherent risk. I am willing to bet 10 (or 20 or 30) times as many people choke to death on Thanksgiving turkey each year. Are you going to ban turkey?
swillfredo pareto | June 26, 2007, 1:03pm | #
There has to be a sensible libertarian solution under which rights are protected *and* people don't die needlessly.Since when is dying of stupidity needless? I encourage it. If anything it is needful.
12 Year Old | June 26, 2007, 1:06pm | #
these are deaths that didn't need to happen.Says you.
Never liked beach patrol guys. I put pungee sticks in my sand-traps.
Jake Boone | June 26, 2007, 1:06pm | #
If you're afraid of it, stay inside your home.We've been warned about this, too! Is no place safe?
Jake Boone | June 26, 2007, 1:08pm | #
There has to be a sensible libertarian solution under which rights are protected *and* people don't die needlessly.There is. It's called "watch where you're going, dumbass." We'd make it into a snazzy, patriotic acronym, but we aren't Congressional enough.
Derrick | June 26, 2007, 1:09pm | #
I suppose privately-owned beaches could make "no digging holes" one of the conditions of use.that's basically what i had in mind, except maybe something more like "no holes deeper than 2 feet" or something.
VikingMoose | June 26, 2007, 1:10pm | #
"Keep Underfoot Neat and Tidy"Taktix® | June 26, 2007, 1:15pm | #
Derrick,2-foot holes are the most dangerous, as they are less visible... the silent killer.
While you're at it, why don't you regulate how high I may climb a tree, or what the maximum arc of a baseball should be.
Shall we have the FDA regulate mud pies too?
Jake Boone | June 26, 2007, 1:16pm | #
As VM has shown, we apparently are Congressional enough. So here is the title of my new bill:Safe And Victorious Enhancements Impeding Danger In Our Treacherous Sands.
Urkobold™ | June 26, 2007, 1:19pm | #
LOTS OF SAND IN THE MIDDLE EAST.COINCIDENCE? THE URKOBOLD THINKS NOT.
Legate Damar | June 26, 2007, 1:23pm | #
Urkobold (and I speak to you in only the most reverential tones) when didst thou begin referring to one's mighty self with a preceding article? It makes thou seem less awe-inspiring and superior.Minion of URKOBOLD | June 26, 2007, 1:27pm | #
Convention from the German -look - there's Hans
da schau her - es ist der Hans.
"Hi. I'm Monika
"Servus. Ich bin die Monika"
Otherwise: der UKROBOLD shall use whatever article (definite, indefinite, null) deemed necessary.
Not only did my nephews and nieces dig holes last summer at the beach, some of them even played with sea shells. Do you have any idea how jagged those edges can be?
Jake Boone | June 26, 2007, 1:45pm | #
Here in Oregon, our beaches have - and I shudder to say it - rocks.VM | June 26, 2007, 1:46pm | #
"some of them even played with sea shells"playing is okay. But she would need a special permit to sell them by the seashore.
[runs]
Urkobold™ | June 26, 2007, 1:50pm | #
Legate Damar,[Taking a rare, rare break from trolling]
Well, my good man, randomly inserting or failing to insert definite articles keeps the audience off balance, don't you know. When I received my fifteenth PhD in Trolling, my thesis was on the hermeneutics of abuse via grammatical methodologies.
[Trolling break over]
LEGATE DAMARASS,
DO NOT ASK WHY THE URKOBOLD BURIES YOU IN THE COLD, COLD GROUND. SIMPLY ACCEPT IT.
MP | June 26, 2007, 1:51pm | #
Urkobold (and I speak to you in only the most reverential tones) when didst thou begin referring to one's mighty self with a preceding article?Must've just graduated from THE Ohio State.
jimmydageek | June 26, 2007, 1:57pm | #
Must've just graduated from THE Ohio State.
Ugh...
It's obvious that Urkobold was the founding father of THE U.
Teddy Ahab Kennedy | June 26, 2007, 1:57pm | #
"It's been almost like a vendetta for him," said Dennis Arnold, who runs the beach patrol in the Martha's Vineyard community of EdgartownGuy's got no clue what a vendetta is, none.
Dr. Scaremonger | June 26, 2007, 1:58pm | #
Collapsing sand pits? Thats not news! I've got an unpublished report based on anecdotes by a lifeguard who may be concocted that will knock your socks off. The real danger is not the pits themselves but rather the illegal immigrant Muslim child predators who lurk in the pits. They lure teens into their clutches with promises of pornography, marijuana and violent video games.Ramses II | June 26, 2007, 1:59pm | #
I warned you.Ozymandias | June 26, 2007, 2:00pm | #
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despairRamses II (aka the Wizard of Ozymandias) | June 26, 2007, 2:09pm | #
Well, that was synchronicity/serendipity!Grünfeld Defence | June 26, 2007, 3:18pm | #
How is one fatality every 16 months for millions of beach-goers even considered a risk?Much the same way that one beach enforcing an overly strict rule is considered a news story.
mediageek | June 26, 2007, 4:55pm | #
Does this mean that Nickelodeon Studios is going to have to go back and digitally remove all of the dirt pits in the movie Holes?Single Issue Voter | June 26, 2007, 5:50pm | #
"Wouldn't it just be simpler to increase the number of shark attacks? That would reduce the newsworthiness of this story."The numbers are much higher (although statistically still small).
Shark attack mortality is not counted if "provoked" or if there is any question that the depredation MIGHT be post mortem (if you are attacked then drown it is a drowning).
Survive with severe trauma? It doesn't "count".
Attacked and eaten with no witnesses and no recovery of the body? Not counted.
The International Shark Attack Database researchers try to minimize fatal shark attacks
in order to fend off "hysteria" and "retaliation".
Stevo Darkly | June 27, 2007, 12:44am | #
They are in the pocket of Big Shark.No, Stevo, Big Shark Week. July 29 to August 4. (No, I'm not in the pocket of Big Discovery Channel.)