Ole Neil Put Her Down
Jesse Walker | December 7, 2005, 1:22pm
I didn't know it was possible to write nearly 2600 words on the subject "Neil Young and Lynyrd Skynyrd: Friends or Foes?," but Thrasher's Wheat not only pulls it off but manages to make it interesting, at least to those of us who are tickled to hear that Young has covered "Sweet Home Alabama" in concert.
[Via Todd Morman.]
David McElroy | December 7, 2005, 2:42pm | #
The only way to see "Sweet Home Alabama" as a racist song is to interpret it as an outsider who doesn't understand the complexities of the South, IMO. If your only understanding of the South comes from watching Hollywood movies and old TV coverage of the Civil Rights movement, I very much doubt that you understand the South (or this song).
I can't claim to know what was in the minds of the band members who wrote the song, but I do have a pretty good understanding of the southern mind. I grew up in the South during the '60s and '70s. There is an odd sense of "place" here that you don't tend to find in other parts of the United States. (You see the odd dualities that we don't have time to talk about here in much of southern literature.) The South feels like a nation unto itself, but many of us seem to have an odd sort of love/hate relationship with the region. I'm proud to be FROM the South, but I don't always like BEING here. I identify with the place and the people, but I don't identify with various racists who have been a part of the landscape here. (And when I say that, I'm talking about troublemakers of both races who have used hate to gain or retain power.)
When I hear "Sweet Home Alabama," I hear someone who is challenging an unfair blanket indictment of their home. (Yes, Lynyrd Skynyrd is from Florida, but they came to Alabama to record their early work.) I don't hear the song as racist in the least. In fact, why wouldn't Neil Young's attacks on southerners be the bigoted songs? He is the one indicting an entire region for the sins of a vocal minority. I see Lynyrd Skynyrd's song as simply saying, "Sorry, buddy. That's not me, so don't lecture me and paint with that broad brush."
The people of the South is unfairly stereotyped to such a large degree that it creates serious resentment. I've had people treat me in a normal, professional way start treating me like an idiot when they find out I live in Birmingham. They are so bigoted (maybe not consciously) that they assume every stereotype they've seen in movies must be true of me. I must live in a trailer and beat my toothless wife while I gather books to burn. The truth is that people are much more alike in different regions than people realize. There are bigots everywhere. The racial problems of the '60s became apparent more quickly here because we had a much higher black population and there was a lot of stored-up resentment left over from the days when blacks had been slaves just a few generations before.
It's interesting that people still associate Birmingham and Alabama with violent racial protests, but places such as Boston don't get painted with the same brush. Remember when forced busing came to Boston in the early '70s? There were violent riots and buses were burned as white parents (and maybe blacks, too) protested against outsiders forcing change on them. Those people were every bit as racist as the southerners of the early '60s, but nobody stereotypes Boston as a racist city. Could it be that journalists KNOW people from Boston, so they KNOW that most people in Boston aren't really hate-mongering racists? Could it be that most journlists don't know people in the South, so it's easier to believe their preconceived notions?
A couple more minor points. Most people don't realize it, but the voters of Birmingham had already voted to get rid of Bull Connor when he turned the police dogs loose on black protesters. He was a racist and most people in Birmingham were far more moderate. They voted to move to a mayor/council form of government (away from a commission form) in order to sweep out the people such as Connor. He was a lame duck waiting for the changeover to happen (at which time he would lose power) when the protests happen. The vote to change forms of government was widely seen as a slap at him and the policies of his allies. I can only assume that he took the opportunity to lash out because of his wounded pride. If the protests had happened just a bit later, the police response would not have been the same.
One part of "Sweet Home Alabama" is just wrong. Birmingham was not a strong area for George Wallace. His strength was in rural areas, not the cities. Also, most people don't realize that Wallace started his career as a moderate on the subject of race, but he lost and early race (in the '50s) to a candidate who was willing to stake out a radical conservative position on the issue. Wallace famously declared privately that he was never going to be "out niggered" again, at which point he became the firebrand playing to rural crowds to grain power.
One final clue as to how contradictory the South can be is seen in Wallace's last run for governor. In 1982, he had been out of office four years, but was trying for a comeback. For the first time ever, a strong GOP challenger mounted a serious campaign. Wallace won, but he only won because he was able to get black votes. Wallace was a politician, not an ideologue. When blacks were voting in large numbers, he made peace the black leaders and bought them off in the same political ways that he had bought off other interest groups in the past. Take away Wallace's black votes and he couldn't have won.
"Sweet Home Alabama" isn't a racist song. It's a song that says, "I'm a southerner, but I'm not that 'southern man' who Young sings about." You can indict specific people for specific racist things, but most of us are just decent people who aren't responsible for what some other people did. And a few of us are even libertarians. :-)