Reason Writers Around Town: Kerry Howley on How Elderly Voters Distort Politics
July 1, 2008, 12:15pm
Over at the New York Times, Senior Editor Kerry Howley talks with The Cato Institute's Will Wilkinson about how geriatric voters are ruining American politics. Click on the image below to watch.
To watch the rest of their conversation, visit Bloggingheads.tv.
Pig Mannix | July 1, 2008, 7:12pm | #
maybe i'm missing the point, but i don't see the cosmotarian handout system in place.
I didn't say "handout", I said redistribution.
Even a "free" market has rules, and he who defines the rules can manipulate the outcomes.
Example: in the antebellum south, plantation owners used slave labor. Now, some of them might have had a moral objection to slavery, but the price of declining to participate in the slave market left as the only alternative paying wages to free labor. Given that this would have forced anyone who chose to decline participation to raise their prices, they would have been non-competitive and forced out of business. Obviously, there weren't many (if any) examples of cotton plantations running on wage labor. Effectively, anyone in the cotton-production business was forced to use slave labor, not through the "hard" coercion of government, but through the "soft" coercion of the market.
Government didn't establish slavery as an institution, market forces did. And they established it just as effectively as any government mandate could have. Note, we don't have a "free" market in slaves anymore.
Likewise, there's nothing "natural" about the demographic evolution you speak of, it's the inevitable outcome of specific economic and labor policies, none of which are necessary. Japan, for example, is confronting it's problem of declining population with
advanced technologies and robotics (surprise! markets can offer more than one solution to a problem!).
Of course, we could
do the same thing here, but then, that wouldn't result in the preferred cosmotarian social outcome, which differs from the socialist policy of redistributing the wealth among the population only by redistributing the population according to the wealth. (I'll leave as an exercise to the reader as to which country will come out ahead - the country that resolves it labor problems through advancing it's technology, or the one which resolves them by importing an underclass.) But while the mechanism differs, the preferred outcome is the same: transfer of wealth from Americans to foreign nationals.
So I'll reiterate: cosmotarianism == socialist ends by "free" market means.