New at Reason

In the latest edition of Friday Funnies, Scott Stantis bravely defends the Constitution.

Comments

Taktix® | October 26, 2007, 7:19am | #

First!

Warren | October 26, 2007, 8:17am | #

the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES
void where prohibited by law

Tbone | October 26, 2007, 8:24am | #

Scott Stantis bravely defends illustrates the cowardice of those who attack the Constitution.

Defense of the Constitution is a requirement of citizenship.

Episiarch | October 26, 2007, 9:09am | #

Defense of the Constitution is a requirement of citizenship.

Yeah, well, it is a requirement for the President, too, but that doesn't seem to matter.

TrickyVic | October 26, 2007, 9:24am | #

Congress and the Military too.

VM | October 26, 2007, 9:30am | #

Taktix - it's your lucky day. The URKOBOLD has chosen to feature you, hier. With the other famous H&R rock n roller, Little Fyodor!

William Walsh | October 26, 2007, 9:36am | #

Defense of the Constitution IS NOT a requirement of citizenship. The Constitution explicitly protects my right to object to it. In fact, I believe it is flawed and society's problems are the result.

Bill Walsh

Taktix® | October 26, 2007, 9:46am | #

VM,

Please send the Great Taint Whitherer my regards and humble praise...

Thanks again!

VM | October 26, 2007, 9:58am | #

just, dammit, man, go on tour - hep the FLA crowd to dates, etc.

Everybody else - check out their stuff. You'll definitely enjoy!

Tripping June. on Ut00B and my space. Tripping June.

Little Fyodor, too!

P Brooks | October 26, 2007, 10:08am | #

Coming soon!

Bill of Rights Toilet Paper!

"Limited government" just sounds so quaint, in a post 9/11 world.

dbust1 | October 26, 2007, 11:08am | #

Based upon what I've heard about the warrantless wire tapping shouldn't there be a keffiyeh draped head somewhere in that audience? Is Stantis saying we've been lied to?!

dbust1 | October 26, 2007, 11:09am | #

Hmmm, on second thought a keffiyeh draped head might make Muslims uncomfortable. That would only lead to overturning and torching cars and various other riotous activities.

Tbone | October 26, 2007, 1:44pm | #

Mr. Walsh, please illucidate.

While natural born citizens take no oath, I would argue that their obligations are certainly not less than naturalized citizens who take the "Oath of Citizenship".

Tbone | October 26, 2007, 1:48pm | #

Elucidate.

I think my brain was between illustrate and illuminate.

Ben Rushing | October 26, 2007, 1:59pm | #

What amazes me is how often Liberals attack the second ammendment and other things within the constitution, only to attempt to defend it when a Republican does something that they would have done if they were in power. (The Democrats have no problem looking into your private life to see if you're a smoker, gun owner, or a drug dealer)