Reason Magazine

Site Search

New at Reason

Radley Balko looks upon what special interests have done to the National Mall, and despairs.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Send this article to:

« Continue Munching On Those Marshmallow… | Main | Cows vs. Cars »

Comments to "New at Reason":

Eric the .5b | November 27, 2006, 11:58am | #

Dude, you have to understand, the idea of the Mall as a serene place for public celebration and quiet contemplation is an outdated view that has to be adapted for our post-industrial times...

Dan T. | November 27, 2006, 12:00pm | #

I agree with Radley, but imagine the response here if somebody floated the argument that your average suburban strip mall wasteland was a tidy symbol of consumerism's bloat and tackiness?

Justin Raimondo | November 27, 2006, 12:00pm | #

Error in headline:

It's "kitsch," not "kitch"

Glad to be of help ....

Seamus | November 27, 2006, 12:22pm | #

When I was growing up in Arlington, Virginia (just across the river), it was simply known as "the Mall" (or maybe "The Mall"), and was so marked on those highway maps that Esso used to hand out back when they had pump jockeys who'd fill up your tank. When did it come to be the "National Mall"? (My guess is that it was some time after "the mall" came generally to apply to the closest enclosed shopping center.)

Alan Vanneman | November 27, 2006, 1:15pm | #

In the old, old days the Mall was covered by temporary office buildings erected during WWI and not torn down until the Johnson Administration. The FDR memorial is extremely popular with tourists, because there is lots for kids to do. Sadly, kids are just not into quiet contemplation these days.

Pro Libertate | November 27, 2006, 1:17pm | #

I liked the Mall best when it was overrun by cheap t-shirt hawkers. Three for five dollars!

Hombre | November 27, 2006, 1:43pm | #

Coming soon: Operation Iraqi Freedom, the ride!

Deus ex Machina | November 27, 2006, 2:06pm | #

Two weeks ago, several thousand people gathered on the National Mall for a "virtual groundbreaking" for a proposed Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial.

The latest figures estimate that this memorial will cost $100 million dollars. Not to mention that a memorial already exists in Atlanta. I'm all for honouring worthy individuals, but doesn't anyone think that this money would be better spent on scholarships or charity? What is wrong with a simple statue?

Postmodern Sleaze | November 27, 2006, 2:43pm | #

Hombre:

I love the part where you get to fly under the mission accomplished banner, only be suddenly shocked with a plunge into hell. Unfortunately, the ride never seems to come to an end...

P Brooks | November 27, 2006, 3:22pm | #

The solution is obvious: more land, for more memorials. That, my friends, is what eminent domain is for. The government must seize and raze the blighted homes of poor people and commence work on National Mall II.

TrickyVic | November 27, 2006, 4:43pm | #

"""Coming soon: Operation Iraqi Freedom, the ride!"""

It will be the longest ride in the park. Getting on is fun, getting off is the tricky part. The operator tells you it's ending for hours buy it never stops.

Ironchef | November 27, 2006, 4:58pm | #

I heard that the new greenspace created from Boston's Big Dig will be completely devoid of monuments for just this reason - you put up one for somebody, you have to put up one for everybody. Is that still true? Do Bostonians have the guts to resist pandering woe-is-us types?

Deus ex Machina | November 27, 2006, 5:10pm | #

Maybe they're saving space for the future memorials of all the people killed by the big dig.