Reason Magazine

Site Search

Police Still at Large

More New Orleans Katrina policing fallout, the case of the missing Caddys:

"It needs to be handled by the Justice Department," [Cadillac dealer] Doug Stead said Tuesday. "... I think right now we've got cops looking for cops."

The state attorney general is investigating allegations New Orleans police made off with nearly 200 cars -- including 41 new Cadillacs -- as the hurricane closed in. The investigation is still under way, a spokeswoman said Tuesday.

Police have acknowledged some cars were taken. It was not considered looting because the officers patrolled in the cars, Capt. Marlon Defillo said. Police are cooperating with the investigation, he said.

"Our cars were flooded," Defillo said. "If it had been Pintos, nobody would have said anything. It got attention because it was Cadillacs."

"They didn't take the little Chevrolets, though, did they?" Stead responded. "They took the Cadillacs, and there were plenty of Impalas here."

It is not considered looting. Sweet.

Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Send this article to:

« I Wonder What the Old… | Main | Dog Bites Man (Et Tu,… »

Comments to "Police Still at Large":

crimethink | October 19, 2005, 10:01pm | #

I would understand how it would not be considered looting if the police reported commandeering the vehicles, and promised to return them and compensate for their use. But of course, that's not the case here.

Also, in the article it says that 80 new Chevys and Caddilacs were missing, so almost as many Chevys were taken as Caddilacs, contrary to what the manager is implying.

JD | October 19, 2005, 11:36pm | #

"It's not looting 'cause I was using it, see?"

Yogi | October 20, 2005, 12:02am | #

Yeah, that's just insane.

Is commandeering even legal? You see it in the movies all the time, but I thought I heard once that is used just as a plot device, and never really happened. Legally, at least.

Douglas Fletcher | October 20, 2005, 5:11am | #

My old man's ID (he's a retired fed) said that he was "authorized to request" use of a vehicle during an emergency, which would to me imply that the request can be denied (this is part of the Constitution anyway, as I recall).

SR | October 20, 2005, 7:11am | #

I would think that under Fifth Amendment standards the city would either have to pay the fair market value of the cars (if it kept them) or pay the depreciation if it returned them.

Elwood | October 20, 2005, 7:29am | #

I love my cop car. It's got a cop motor, a four hundred and forty-cubic-inch plant. Cop springs. Cop shocks. Cop suspension. Con tires. It was a model made before catalytic converters, so it runs on regular gas.

thoreau | October 20, 2005, 8:04am | #

I would think that under Fifth Amendment standards the city would either have to pay the fair market value of the cars (if it kept them) or pay the depreciation if it returned them.

Ah, but the cars were blighted, so the fair market value was zero.

And keeping the cars anyway is part of the cops' personal economic redevelopment plans.

Pro Libertate | October 20, 2005, 9:02am | #

Elwood, that car's got a lot of pick up.

abdul | October 20, 2005, 10:15am | #

It's like the photograph captions say:
Black people loot.
White people find.
Police people commandeer.

ralphus | October 20, 2005, 10:37am | #

Come on. All hell is breaking loose. You've got to commandeer a car. What are you gonna commandeer? The Geo Tracker? Or the Escalade?

That's just how NOPD rolls baby!

Besides. You wouldn't want those fine ass 'Lacs to end up in the hands of a a roving band of cracked-out, baby raping, cannabalistic, EMS shooting looters now would you?

Huggy Bear | October 20, 2005, 11:52am | #

Thing is, I know some people that know some people who robbed some people.

bubba | October 20, 2005, 12:07pm | #

If the police department has possession of the vehicles, they were used for actual patrolling, and the dealer is paid for them, then it's not looting.

If the vehicles are parked at the homes of police officers, and/or the police department does not have a full accounting of them, then they are stolen.

One could argue that the cars would have been looted [blighted :)] anyway, but I'm not aware that insurance companies pay off for hypothetical losses.

Homer | October 20, 2005, 12:12pm | #

Awww, I was gonna loot you a present!

poco | October 20, 2005, 1:05pm | #

The last Pinto was made 25 years ago. Get some more recent references, Wiggum.

nofollow breaks blogs | October 20, 2005, 1:29pm | #

Only problem: in an earlier report, Sneed said the dealership started losing inventory before the storm even hit.

Deus ex Machina | October 20, 2005, 4:33pm | #

The last Pinto was made 25 years ago. Get some more recent references, Wiggum.

Wasn't there a movie a couple of years ago where the entire police force drove Yugos?