Back To School Shootings
Tim Cavanaugh | March 22, 2005, 2:38pm
After a longish respite, double-digit school shooting rampages return, as a spree at Red Lake High School on Minnesota's* Red Lake Indian Reservation leaves 10 dead (including the apparent gunman). The alleged shooter is 17-year-old Jeff Weise, said to have held "anti-social beliefs" and posted pro-Hitler messages on a neo-Nazi message board. Security procedures proved useless in this case, as Weise apparently shot his way through the metal detector, killing the school's unarmed security guard.
* Corrected
rob | March 22, 2005, 5:52pm | #
This is tragic, and we can all agree that we feel terrible for these kids and their families.
Well, all of us except joe, who seems to almost imply that the grandfather deserved it for owning guns.
I'm confused by this, since the grandfather was a cop. joe has previously said cops SHOULD be armed better than the average citizen (the better to impose on regular citizens). Though I disagree with this, I'm thoroughly confused by joe's stance - it seems contradictory.
Jesse Ventura had it right. joe as usual has it wrong. "I imagine the cop assumed his guns were safely hidden." Sure, blame the grandfather whose firearms were stolen after he was murdered. Way to blame the victim, joe. Next you'll be telling Terry Schiavo vegetable jokes... Pretty sad.
One of the most tragic things about these incidents is that there could have been far less loss of life or it might have even been completely prevented.
If the adults who saw fit to put the kid "in the school's Homebound program for some violation of policy" - presumably due to the threat of violence - were allowed to bring a firearm to school to protect themselves and their students this probably wouldn't be news right now.
Can I hold joe accountable if someone steals his car and then runs over 12 high school kids with it? Obviously not, and rightfully neither should the grandfather be held responsible for this tragedy.
Even cops on duty, or anyone else for that matter, can have their firearm stolen by someone willing to ambush them. That doesn't mean no one should have a gun, but that the restrictions on civilians carrying firearms for their own protection should be eliminated.
Being rendered defenseless by the gov't means that the GOV'T should share some of the blame for this incident, not the grandfather.
Larry A | March 22, 2005, 8:41pm | #
The whole no guns/no knives/weapons-free/see-through backpacks/eliminate lockers/metal detectors/security guards thing doesn't seem to be working.
When I was in the second grade I was a member of the Cub Scout pack sponsored by the local elementary school. Part of our uniform was the Cub Scout pocket knife, which included a blade, can opener, bottle opener, and screw driver. We all carried them to school once a week, depending on what day our particular den met.
I learned that having a knife was handy, and as a result I carried a pocket knife all the way through high school. All the teachers knew I had it, and on occasion would borrow it or ask me to cut something. And I was far from the only student who had one. I never remember anyone getting in trouble for misusing a pocket knife.
Of course when I graduated (1965) our Texas high school also had a rifle team, as did almost every high school in New York City. (
Note: Not the Wild West, or the Violent South, or those Redneck Rural Areas;
New York City.) In the Big Apple students commuted with their .22 target rifles on the subway, and no one paid any attention.
Perhaps treating teenagers like they can handle that kind of responsibility makes more sense than putting troublemakers in "Homebound."
Joe: [I imagine the cop assumed his guns were safely hidden.]
One of the points that the Texas Department of Public Safety includes in the Texas Concealed Handgun License course curriculum is that hiding firearms is not an effective way to keep them away from children.
C'mon, Joe. Didn't you know where everything in your house was when you were growing up?